15 Jan 2015
Order issued
ConcludedThe Jharkhand High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: 2015 LAB. I. C. 3838; 2015 (3) AJR 806
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2015-0017Dhanbad, JharkhandJudgment 15 January 2015
Koyla Nagar Police Constable vs The Union of India and Others
The Jharkhand High Court (Sujit Narayan Prasad J.) dismissed a CISF constable's writ challenging his removal dated 21 October 2009. The court found proved three charges: absence from main-gate duty at Koyla Nagar on 6-7 April 2009, abusing higher officials with bullet threats on 7 April 2009, and five prior punishments for indiscipline. It held that concurrent findings of three authorities on record material cannot be reappreciated in writ review and that the removal was not shockingly disproportionate. The removal, already affirmed in revision on 31 March 2010, therefore stands. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 15 January 2015 in W.P.(S) No. 4822 of 2011, the Jharkhand High Court (Coram: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable, Central Industrial Security Force, Koyla Nagar, Dhanbad.
- Register number
- JH 10 CW 0006
- Case reference
- W.P.(S) No. 4822 of 2011 / 2015 LAB. I. C. 3838; 2015 (3) AJR 806
- Court and date
- Jharkhand High Court (Coram: Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.), 15 January 2015
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, Central Industrial Security Force, Koyla Nagar, Dhanbad
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Article 226 of the Constitution of India; Rule 32(1) of the CISF Rules, 2001; Rule 34 of the CISF Rules, 2001
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “Other allegation of using abusive language against the higher authorities and the members of the Office of the Inspector is also serious. The witnesses have corroborated the said allegation in their deposition.” (at para 14)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Jharkhand High Court judgment dated 15 January 2015 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“Other allegation of using abusive language against the higher authorities and the members of the Office of the Inspector is also serious. The witnesses have corroborated the said allegation in their deposition.” (para 14)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.