Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: LAWS(MPH)-2017-9-83
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2017-0008Shajapur, Madhya PradeshJudgment 1 September 2017
Mohan Barodiya Man v. Lokayukta Special Police Establishment, Bhopal
The Madhya Pradesh High Court (Indore Bench) affirmed the conviction of SHO of Police Station Mohan Barodiya by the Special Judge, Shajapur (Special Case 1/2002, judgment 26 September 2003) under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The prosecution case was that when complainant [name withheld] reported on 7 January 2002 that Ramesh Chandra had snatched Rs. 915 from him, the SHO demanded Rs. 1,000 to take action, and on 16 January 2002 a Lokayukta trap at Jain Uphar Grih caught him accepting the money with phenolphthalein wash turning pink. The affirmation, despite the complainant turning hostile, is expressly recorded in two later Indore Bench judgments. The sentence of one year's rigorous imprisonment with fine on each count stands affirmed. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 1 September 2017 in Criminal Appeal No. 952/2003, the Madhya Pradesh High Court affirmed the conviction of the Station House Officer, Police Station Mohan Barodiya, Shajapur.
- Register number
- MP 42 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal No. 952/2003 / LAWS(MPH)-2017-9-83
- Court and date
- Madhya Pradesh High Court, 1 September 2017
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Station House Officer, Police Station Mohan Barodiya, Shajapur
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “This Court in the case of [name withheld] Vs. Lokayukta, Special Police Establishment, Bhopal (Criminal Appeal No. 952/2003) even though the complainant has turned hostile, has affirmed the conviction.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 1 year.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment dated 1 September 2017 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“This Court in the case of [name withheld] Vs. Lokayukta, Special Police Establishment, Bhopal (Criminal Appeal No. 952/2003) even though the complainant has turned hostile, has affirmed the conviction.”
Separate from verification
Institutional response
1 Sep 2017
Order issued
ConcludedThe Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: LAWS(MPH)-2017-9-83
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.