26 Apr 2017
Order issued
ConcludedThe Patna High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4508 of 2009
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2017-0022Dibrugarh, AssamJudgment 26 April 2017
CISF Constable vs The Union of India and Others
The judgment of the Patna High Court records the following account. [name withheld], CISF Constable. 894340365 on internal security duty at Oil Duliajan, was charge-sheeted for abusing Head Constable on 01.04.2006 and threatening on the counting parade that he could use his service weapon and 100 rounds to kill him, against a record of one major and eleven minor punishments. The Commandant dismissed him on 13.02.2007 after a full departmental proceeding; the DIG confirmed the dismissal on 29.05.2007 and the IG rejected his revision on 23.05.2008. He challenged the orders before the Patna High Court under Article 226. The Court found full procedure had been followed with the enquiry report supplied, the charges stood admitted leaving no scope to differ on proof, and no illegality in decision-making was shown. The writ petition was dismissed and the dismissal from service stands. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 26 April 2017 in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4508 of 2009, the Patna High Court (Coram: Rakesh Kumar, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable, CISF (DM Battalion Mundali; internal security duty, Oil Duliajan).
- Register number
- AS 06 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4508 of 2009
- Court and date
- Patna High Court (Coram: Rakesh Kumar, J.), 26 April 2017
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, CISF (DM Battalion Mundali; internal security duty, Oil Duliajan)
- Present service status
- Recorded in the cited sources as dismissed from service.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “Since nothing has been brought to the notice of the Court regarding any illegality in taking decision, it would be difficult for this Court to interfere with either of the orders. Accordingly, I do not find any ground to pass …” (at para 8)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Patna High Court judgment dated 26 April 2017 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“Since nothing has been brought to the notice of the Court regarding any illegality in taking decision, it would be difficult for this Court to interfere with either of the orders. Accordingly, I do not find any ground to pass …” (para 8)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.