23 Nov 2017
Order issued
ConcludedThe Patna High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2018) 2 PLJR 790
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2017-0037BiharJudgment 23 November 2017
Union of India and Others vs CRPF Constable
Delete 'already affirmed in appeal, revision and memorial'; judgment records only writ (CWJC 3390/2009) and LPA 1502/2013.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 23 November 2017 in L.P.A. No. 1502 of 2013, the Patna High Court (Coram: Rajendra Menon, Anil Kumar Upadhyay, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable, 4th Battalion, CRPF.
- Register number
- BR 00 CW 0004
- Case reference
- L.P.A. No. 1502 of 2013 / (2018) 2 PLJR 790
- Court and date
- Patna High Court (Coram: Rajendra Menon, Anil Kumar Upadhyay, JJ.), 23 November 2017
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, 4th Battalion, CRPF
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 11 of the CRPF Act, 1949; Rule 15 of the CRPF Rules, 1955
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “In view of the aforesaid enunciation of law by the learned Division Benches of this Court, we find that once the employee is found to have committed a misconduct which falls under Rule 15 of the Rules of 1955 the …” (at para n/a (unnumbered LPA judgment dated 23.11.2017))
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Patna High Court judgment dated 23 November 2017 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“In view of the aforesaid enunciation of law by the learned Division Benches of this Court, we find that once the employee is found to have committed a misconduct which falls under Rule 15 of the Rules of 1955 the …” (para n/a (unnumbered LPA judgment dated 23.11.2017))
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.