Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.
The Division Bench upheld the convictions of Constable and Sub-Inspector Sher Singh of PS Lahori Gate for beating night-watchman a Lahori Gate man to death. Picked up around midnight on 1-5-1991 and illegally confined at the police station, the victim was beaten mercilessly while his father was asked for bribes for his release; he died on 10-5-1991. The court called it a case where guardians of law became its transgressors, upholding [name withheld]'s sections 302/330/348 conviction and Sher Singh's section 304-II conviction with surrender in 10 days. SHO was acquitted for want of a properly framed charge, but the court directed disciplinary proceedings against all including [name withheld] for fabrication of evidence. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 3 January 2018 in Crl. A. Nos. 54/2004, 81/2004 & 198/2004 (against trial judgment 06-01-2004), the Delhi High Court (Coram: G. S. Sistani, Sangita Dhingra Sehgal, JJ.) affirmed the conviction of 2 police personnel, namely: Constable, PS Lahori Gate, Delhi; Sher Singh (Sub-Inspector).
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Delhi High Court judgment dated 3 January 2018 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“To conclude, we uphold the conviction of the appellant [name withheld] under Sections 302, 330 and 348 and the sentence imposed by the Trial Court. The conviction and sentence of appellant Sher Singh is also upheld. Appellant [name withheld] is …” (para 156)
The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.