CW-2019-0015Cuddalore, Tamil NaduJudgment 4 September 2019

Neyveli Man vs The State of Tamil Nadu and Others

replace ' ' — Inspector's denials (daily release on muchalika; JIPMER-attack story) and State's quantum objection (Rs.5L cap citing Sangaiyya) are recorded; summarize per R52. Age: court computed on 36 years (paras 73-74), petitioner pleaded 35. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 4 September 2019 in W.P. No. 9267 of 2017, the Madras High Court (Coram: S. Manikumar, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 3 police personnel, namely: Inspector of Police, Neyveli Township Police Station; Inspector of Police, Nellikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore; Constable, Neyveli Township Police Station, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 30.1 lakh (Rs 30,09,648).

Register number
TN 31 CW 0008
Case reference
W.P. No. 9267 of 2017 / AIRONLINE 2019 MAD 672; (2019) 7 MAD LJ 652
Court and date
Madras High Court (Coram: S. Manikumar, Subramonium Prasad, JJ.), 4 September 2019
Officer(s) at the material time
Inspector of Police, Neyveli Township Police Station; Inspector of Police, Nellikuppam Police Station, Cuddalore; Constable, Neyveli Township Police Station
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Not stated in the cited sources
Finding of the Court (extract)
“prefix with 'Hence, ' per para 76 ('Hence, the total compensation works out to Rs.30,09,648/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.')” (at para 76)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 30.1 lakh (Rs 30,09,648).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Madras High Court judgment dated 4 September 2019 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“prefix with 'Hence, ' per para 76 ('Hence, the total compensation works out to Rs.30,09,648/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.')” (para 76)

Institutional response

1
4 Sep 2019

Order issued

Concluded
Madras High Court External · Binding

The Madras High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 3,009,648.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: AIRONLINE 2019 MAD 672; (2019) 7 MAD LJ 652
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.