1 Aug 2019
Order issued
ConcludedThe Chhattisgarh High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: (2019) 08 CHH CK 0011
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2019-0034ChhattisgarhJudgment 1 August 2019
Chhattisgarh Police Constable v. State of Chhattisgarh
The Division Bench dismissed police constable 's writ appeal against the Single Judge's order dated 18 April 2016, upholding his dismissal from service ordered on 11 March 2003. The court held all three departmental charges proved: 43 days of unauthorised absence, misbehaviour with a victim woman, and incorrigible conduct despite earlier punishments. It rejected his technical pleas about the enquiry procedure, finding no prejudice, and held that his acquittal in the related criminal case did not undo the departmental finding. The court found no illegality in the Single Judge's order and dismissed the appeal as sans merit.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 1 August 2019 in WA No. 412 of 2016, the Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Parth Prateem Sahu, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable.
- Register number
- CG 00 CW 0004
- Case reference
- WA No. 412 of 2016 / (2019) 08 CHH CK 0011
- Court and date
- Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Parth Prateem Sahu, JJ.), 1 August 2019
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable
- Present service status
- Recorded in the cited sources as dismissed from service.
- Provisions invoked
- Rule 14(6) of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1966
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “For the foregoing discussion, we do not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order passed by learned Single Judge warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction. The writ appeal sans merit and is accordingly …” (at para 14)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Chhattisgarh High Court judgment dated 1 August 2019 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“For the foregoing discussion, we do not find any illegality or infirmity in the impugned order passed by learned Single Judge warranting interference by this Court in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction. The writ appeal sans merit and is accordingly …” (para 14)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.