CW-2020-0002Kollam, KeralaJudgment 7 January 2020

Jayakumar vs State Of Kerala

The judgment of the Kerala High Court records the following account. A Kollam man, picked up from Sanker's Hospital, Kollam, on 6 April 2005 on suspicion of mobile-phone theft, was informally detained without recording arrest and tortured by two crime-squad constables of Kollam East Police Station at the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel police museum lock-up to extract a confession; he died the same evening and the death was homicidal. The trial court convicted both constables of custodial murder under Sections 302 and 348 read with Section 34 IPC. A Division Bench of the Kerala High Court held the deceased was in the exclusive custody of the two accused and, finding no intent to kill, altered the murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder with five years rigorous imprisonment each, confirmed the wrongful-confinement conviction and sentences to run concurrently, and left the Rs 2,00,000 compensation to the victim's mother undisturbed. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 7 January 2020 in Crl.A. No. 1267 of 2014, the Kerala High Court (Coram: A. Hariprasad, N. Anil Kumar, JJ.) affirmed the conviction of 2 police personnel, namely: Jayakumar (Police Constable); M. Venugopal (Police Constable), and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).

Register number
KL 02 CW 0011
Case reference
Crl.A. No. 1267 of 2014
Court and date
Kerala High Court (Coram: A. Hariprasad, N. Anil Kumar, JJ.), 7 January 2020
Officer(s) at the material time
Jayakumar (Police Constable); M. Venugopal (Police Constable)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 348 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“We are satisfied with the evidence that the deceased was tortured by A1 and A2 with an intention to extract confession in connection with a theft case.” (at para 74)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 5 years. Compensation: Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Kerala High Court judgment dated 7 January 2020 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“We are satisfied with the evidence that the deceased was tortured by A1 and A2 with an intention to extract confession in connection with a theft case.” (para 74)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Kerala High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Kerala High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: Crl.A. No. 1267 of 2014
Not yet re-checked.
7 Jan 2020

Order issued

Concluded
Kerala High Court External · Binding

The Kerala High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: Crl.A. No. 1267 of 2014
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.