Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Delhi High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: AIRONLINE 2021 DEL 1636
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2021-0007North West Delhi, DelhiJudgment 15 September 2021
Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs C.B.I.
The Delhi High Court dismissed ASI 's appeal and sustained his CBI-trap conviction, withdrawing bail granted in 2001 and ordering him taken into custody forthwith. The court found that while investigating a kidnapping complaint against a Keshav Puram man, he demanded Rs 10,000 reduced to Rs 5,000 on 15 June 1996 threatening arrest even though the couple had married with family consent; he accepted the tainted notes, then assaulted CBI officers, smashed the hand-wash glass and fled to the police-post roof before recapture. The court held demand, acceptance and recovery proved by the shadow witness and trap party despite minor variations. The concurrent sentences under the PC Act and IPC provisions, with a maximum of 3 years simple imprisonment, were sustained. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 15 September 2021 in CRL.A. 289/2001, the Delhi High Court (Coram: Anu Malhotra, J.) affirmed the conviction of the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Post Shanti Nagar, P.S. Keshav Puram, Delhi Police.
- Register number
- DL 08 CW 0019
- Case reference
- CRL.A. 289/2001 / AIRONLINE 2021 DEL 1636
- Court and date
- Delhi High Court (Coram: Anu Malhotra, J.), 15 September 2021
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Post Shanti Nagar, P.S. Keshav Puram, Delhi Police
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 224 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 332 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “There is thus, no infirmity in the impugned judgment convicting the appellant for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 7 & 13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.” (at para 77)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment; maximum substantive term of 3 years.
- Present status of the proceedings
- Supreme Court of India, 25 October 2021: appeal pending.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Delhi High Court judgment dated 15 September 2021 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“There is thus, no infirmity in the impugned judgment convicting the appellant for the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 7 & 13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.” (para 77)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
15 Sep 2021
Order issued
ConcludedThe Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: AIRONLINE 2021 DEL 1636
Not yet re-checked.
25 Oct 2021
Appeal pending
PendingAs of 25 October 2021, an appeal arising from this judgment was pending before the Supreme Court of India (officers: [name withheld]); the judgment's findings had not been set aside on that date.
Source: Order Law
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.