CW-2021-0010Varanasi, Uttar PradeshJudgment 11 June 2021

Rohania Man and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

The judgment of the Allahabad High Court records the following account. Police arrested the two petitioners under Section 151 Cr.P.C. on 8 October 2020 over an ancestral land dispute, and a Sub-Inspector of Rohania police station sent a printed-form challani report under Sections 151/107/116 Cr.P.C. with only names and the words 'land dispute' filled in. The SDM registered the case without recording satisfaction or issuing a show-cause order and kept the petitioners detained from 12 to 21 October 2020 even after they submitted personal bonds. The Division Bench held the police authorities were arbitrarily and illegally submitting such challani reports and that the SDM acted in clear breach of Sections 107, 111 and 116 Cr.P.C. and Article 21. It recorded payment of Rs. 25,000 compensation to each petitioner under the State policy of 23 March 2021 and issued statewide compliance directions. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 11 June 2021 in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 16386 of 2020, the Allahabad High Court (Coram: Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Shamim Ahmed, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Sub-Inspector, Police Station Rohania, Varanasi, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 50,000.

Register number
UP 65 CW 0001
Case reference
Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 16386 of 2020 / AIRONLINE 2021 ALL 1297
Court and date
Allahabad High Court (Coram: Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Shamim Ahmed, JJ.), 11 June 2021
Officer(s) at the material time
Sub-Inspector, Police Station Rohania, Varanasi
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 151 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; Section 116 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Non release of the petitioners by the respondent no.3 even after submission of personal bond/bail bond and other papers, is a clear breach of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” (at para 14)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 50,000.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Allahabad High Court judgment dated 11 June 2021 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Non release of the petitioners by the respondent no.3 even after submission of personal bond/bail bond and other papers, is a clear breach of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” (para 14)

Institutional response

1
11 Jun 2021

Order issued

Concluded
Allahabad High Court External · Binding

The Allahabad High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 50,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: AIRONLINE 2021 ALL 1297
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.