CW-2022-0036Hamirpur, Uttar PradeshJudgment 22 December 2022

U.P. Police Constable vs State of U.P.

The Allahabad High Court (Division Bench, 22 December 2022) partly allowed Criminal Appeal No. 4666 of 2014 but sustained the guilt of U.P. Police Constable of Police Station Chikasi, Hamirpur, who on 2 January 2008 abused and beat fellow constable with a rifle butt at the station gate and then fired his government rifle at the constable's mother [name withheld] when she intervened; she died of the gunshot injury after giving a dying declaration. The Court held the killing was homicidal but unpremeditated, a single shot in the spur of the moment, converting the trial court's Section 302 IPC life sentence (Sessions Trial No. 9 of 2009, decided 27 November 2014) to Section 304 Part I IPC. The appellant was sentenced to the period already undergone (10 years 7 months with remission) with a fine of Rs.5,000 (three months' simple imprisonment in default). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 22 December 2022 in Criminal Appeal No. 4666 of 2014, the Allahabad High Court (Coram: Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, Ajai Tyagi, JJ.) affirmed the conviction of the Constable, U.P. Police, Police Station Chikasi, Hamirpur.

Register number
UP 91 CW 0001
Case reference
Criminal Appeal No. 4666 of 2014
Court and date
Allahabad High Court (Coram: Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, Ajai Tyagi, JJ.), 22 December 2022
Officer(s) at the material time
Constable, U.P. Police, Police Station Chikasi, Hamirpur
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 302 (trial court; converted to s.304 Part I on appeal) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 304 Part I of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“On overall scrutiny of the facts and circumstances of this case coupled with dying declaration and other evidence on record, we are of the considered opinion that offence would be punishable under Section 304 (Part I) because it appears that …” (at para 17)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 10.58 years.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Allahabad High Court judgment dated 22 December 2022 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“On overall scrutiny of the facts and circumstances of this case coupled with dying declaration and other evidence on record, we are of the considered opinion that offence would be punishable under Section 304 (Part I) because it appears that …” (para 17)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Allahabad High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Allahabad High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: Criminal Appeal No. 4666 of 2014
Not yet re-checked.
22 Dec 2022

Order issued

Concluded
Allahabad High Court External · Binding

The Allahabad High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: Criminal Appeal No. 4666 of 2014
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.