CW-2023-0018Sukma, ChhattisgarhJudgment 14 July 2023

Minpa Man v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

The judgment of the Chhattisgarh High Court records the following account. A Minpa man (about 30), of Minpa village under PS Chintagupha, Sukma, was arrested on a wrong identity, sharing his name with a wanted accused, though not wanted in any criminal case, and spent 7 months 26 days in Dantewada jail. The Additional Sessions Judge, Dantewada released him on 3 March 2022, finding the detention illegal and directing SP action against the erring personnel. Before the High Court the State admitted the illegal detention. A Division Bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Rajani Dubey directed the State to pay Rs.1,00,000 compensation within two months, noting ASI had died during the departmental enquiry. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 14 July 2023 in WPCR No. 579 of 2022, the Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Ramesh Sinha, Rajani Dubey, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Station Chintagupha, Sukma; Station House Officer, Police Station Chintagupha, Sukma, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 1 lakh (Rs 1,00,000).

Register number
CG 26 CW 0001
Case reference
WPCR No. 579 of 2022
Court and date
Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Ramesh Sinha, Rajani Dubey, JJ.), 14 July 2023
Officer(s) at the material time
Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Station Chintagupha, Sukma; Station House Officer, Police Station Chintagupha, Sukma
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Not stated in the cited sources
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Taking into consideration the great harm done to the petitioner by the State authorities, he has to remain in jail for a period of about 8 months whereas he was not wanted in any criminal case and was arrested on …” (at para 7)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 1 lakh (Rs 1,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Chhattisgarh High Court judgment dated 14 July 2023 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Taking into consideration the great harm done to the petitioner by the State authorities, he has to remain in jail for a period of about 8 months whereas he was not wanted in any criminal case and was arrested on …” (para 7)

Institutional response

1
14 Jul 2023

Order issued

Concluded
Chhattisgarh High Court External · Binding

The Chhattisgarh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 100,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: WPCR No. 579 of 2022
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

2
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

25 Sep 2026

(Audit fix: duplicate record CW-2023-0046 (same court, case number and judgment date) merged into this record; its sources are kept here and its URL redirects here.)

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.