CW-2023-0026Dharmapuri, Tamil NaduJudgment 29 September 2023

L. Nadhan and others vs State by [name withheld], CBI

The judgment of the Madras High Court records the following account. Replace 'June 1992 the complainant atrocities' with 'June 1992 the complainant atrocities' and '18 the complainant women' with '18 the complainant women'. Note max sentence is 10 years RI under SC/ST Act s.3(2)(v) (para 4 table Sl.No.8), not 'up to 7 years' (7 years is the Sec 376 IPC component only). Totals '215 officials, including 84 police' are not stated in HC text (which speaks of 269 accused, confirms convictions) — retain only if trial-judgment citation added, else drop counts.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 29 September 2023 in Crl.A. Nos. 618, 622, 624-626, 635, 649, 653-654, 657-660, 662, 665-666, 668-671, 673, 679, 682, 690, 692 of 2011, the Madras High Court (Coram: P. Velmurugan, J., J.) affirmed the conviction of the L. Nadhan & 83 other police personnel (Various ranks), and directed payment of compensation of Rs 180 lakh (Rs 1,80,00,000).

Register number
TN 29 CW 0002
Case reference
Crl.A. Nos. 618, 622, 624-626, 635, 649, 653-654, 657-660, 662, 665-666, 668-671, 673, 679, 682, 690, 692 of 2011 / 2023:MHC:4526
Court and date
Madras High Court (Coram: P. Velmurugan, J., J.), 29 September 2023
Officer(s) at the material time
L. Nadhan & 83 other police personnel (Various ranks)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 147 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; Section 3(1)(xi) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989; Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Finding of the Court (extract)
“In view of the above discussion and for the foregoing reasons, this Court finds all the accused have committed the charged offences. There are no merits in these appeals and the same are liable to be dismissed.” (at para 104)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 7.0 years. Compensation: Rs 180 lakh (Rs 1,80,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Madras High Court judgment dated 29 September 2023 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial torturePrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“In view of the above discussion and for the foregoing reasons, this Court finds all the accused have committed the charged offences. There are no merits in these appeals and the same are liable to be dismissed.” (para 104)

Institutional response

2
Date not established

Conviction

Concluded
Trial court (as recorded in the Madras High Court judgment) External · Binding

The trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Madras High Court judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 2023:MHC:4526
Not yet re-checked.
29 Sep 2023

Order issued

Concluded
Madras High Court External · Binding

The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.

Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: 2023:MHC:4526
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.