CW-2024-0015Surat, GujaratJudgment 2 September 2024

Surat Man vs Kamal Dayani and Ors.

The Supreme Court held Police Inspector of Vesu police station, Surat, guilty of contempt for arresting Tusharbhai Shah on 11.12.2023 and obtaining his police-custody remand in defiance of the Court's subsisting interim anticipatory bail order dated 08.12.2023. By the guilt judgment dated 07.08.2024 the inspector and the remanding magistrate were both held guilty; the Court condemned the practice of seeking remand despite subsisting anticipatory bail. By the sentence order dated 02.09.2024 the magistrate's apology was accepted while the inspector was sentenced to a fine of Rs 25,000. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 2 September 2024 in Contempt Petition (C) Diary No. 1106 of 2024 in SLP (Crl.) No. 14489 of 2023, the Supreme Court of India (Coram: B.R. Gavai, J.) recorded the conviction of the Police Inspector, Vesu Police Station, Surat.

Register number
GJ 05 CW 0004
Case reference
Contempt Petition (C) Diary No. 1106 of 2024 in SLP (Crl.) No. 14489 of 2023
Court and date
Supreme Court of India (Coram: B.R. Gavai, J.), 2 September 2024
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Inspector, Vesu Police Station, Surat
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Insofar as Shri [name withheld], Police Inspector, Vesu Police Station, Surat (Contemnor-respondent No.4) is concerned, we sentence him to pay fine in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, to be deposited in the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association to be used for the …” (at para 8)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction entered by Supreme Court. Sentence: fine.
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Supreme Court of India judgment dated 2 September 2024 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Insofar as Shri [name withheld], Police Inspector, Vesu Police Station, Surat (Contemnor-respondent No.4) is concerned, we sentence him to pay fine in the sum of Rs.25,000/-, to be deposited in the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association to be used for the …” (para 8)

Institutional response

1
2 Sep 2024

Order issued

Concluded
Supreme Court of India External · Binding

The Supreme Court of India entered convictions against police personnel in this judgment.

Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: Contempt Petition (C) Diary No. 1106 of 2024 in SLP (Crl.) No. 14489 of 2023
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.