Date not established
Conviction
ConcludedThe trial court convicted the accused police personnel, as recorded in the Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment.
Conviction · Supports allegation.
Source: 2024:MPHC-IND:33084
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2024-0021Rajgarh, Madhya PradeshJudgment 21 November 2024
Biaora Police Assistant Sub-Inspector vs State of Madhya Pradesh
The judgment of the Madhya Pradesh High Court records the following account. Assistant Sub-Inspector Omprakash Mishra and Constable Naval Singh Meena of Biaora Police Station, Rajgarh, were prosecuted for demanding and accepting illegal gratification to release complainant [name withheld]'s nephew [name withheld] from unlawful police custody. During a Lokayukta trap on October 14, 2009, Mishra accepted Rs. 6,500 in tainted currency, handed it to Constable, and both fled on a motorcycle while brandishing a service revolver at the trap team. The Special Judge, Rajgarh, convicted both under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and sentenced them to two years rigorous imprisonment. The Madhya Pradesh High Court (Indore Bench) dismissed their appeals, holding that the demand and trap were proved beyond reasonable doubt.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 21 November 2024 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 483 of 2014 & 505 of 2014, the Madhya Pradesh High Court (Coram: Subodh Abhyankar, J.) affirmed the conviction of 2 police personnel, namely: Omprakash Mishra (Assistant Sub-Inspector); Naval Singh Meena (Constable).
- Register number
- MP 39 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal Nos. 483 of 2014 & 505 of 2014 / 2024:MPHC-IND:33084
- Court and date
- Madhya Pradesh High Court (Coram: Subodh Abhyankar, J.), 21 November 2024
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Omprakash Mishra (Assistant Sub-Inspector); Naval Singh Meena (Constable)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “In such circumstances, so far as the demand of bribe is concerned, it stands proved against the appellant [name withheld].” (at para 22)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction upheld. Sentence: imprisonment and fine; maximum substantive term of 2 years.
- Present status of the proceedings
- No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
The Madhya Pradesh High Court judgment dated 21 November 2024 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“In such circumstances, so far as the demand of bribe is concerned, it stands proved against the appellant [name withheld].” (para 22)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
21 Nov 2024
Order issued
ConcludedThe Madhya Pradesh High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the convictions of police personnel.
Conviction · Supports allegation (appellate affirmance; trial conviction separate card).
Source: 2024:MPHC-IND:33084
Not yet re-checked.
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.