CW-2025-0008Korba, ChhattisgarhJudgment 13 June 2025

Korba Man v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

The judgment of the Chhattisgarh High Court records the following account. Replace tagline with State contention (fall on railway line) and its rejection on post-mortem/CCTV grounds. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 13 June 2025 in WPCR No. 503 of 2024, the Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Ramesh Sinha, Bibhu Datta Guru, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line Rampur, Korba; Station House Officer staff, Police Station Darri, Korba, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).

Register number
CG 12 CW 0001
Case reference
WPCR No. 503 of 2024 / 2025:CGHC:23811-DB
Court and date
Chhattisgarh High Court (Coram: Ramesh Sinha, Bibhu Datta Guru, JJ.), 13 June 2025
Officer(s) at the material time
Station House Officer, Police Station Civil Line Rampur, Korba; Station House Officer staff, Police Station Darri, Korba
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Not stated in the cited sources
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The State being the employer of the employees on account of whose negligence the death of deceased took place, is liable to pay such compensation to the petitioners.” (at para 19)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 13 June 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The State being the employer of the employees on account of whose negligence the death of deceased took place, is liable to pay such compensation to the petitioners.” (para 19)

Institutional response

1
13 Jun 2025

Order issued

Concluded
Chhattisgarh High Court External · Binding

The Chhattisgarh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 200,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2025:CGHC:23811-DB
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.