CW-2025-0026NTR, Andhra PradeshJudgment 10 November 2025

Vijayawada Man vs The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors.

remove/replace final sentence; police claim (detenu attended on notice) recorded and disbelieved; SHO examined in court. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 10 November 2025 in W.P. No. 25601 of 2024, the Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: R. Raghunandan Rao, T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Inspector of Police (Station House Officer), NTR Police Station (Cyber Crime), Vijayawada, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 10,000.

Register number
AP 39 CW 0042
Case reference
W.P. No. 25601 of 2024
Court and date
Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: R. Raghunandan Rao, T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.), 10 November 2025
Officer(s) at the material time
Inspector of Police (Station House Officer), NTR Police Station (Cyber Crime), Vijayawada
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Article 21 of the Constitution of India; Article 22 of the Constitution of India; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The fundamental rights of the detenue, guaranteed under Article 21 and Article 22 of the Constitution of India, protecting him against arbitrary detention and assuring him of being produced before a magistrate, within 24 hours of such detention have clearly …” (at para 20)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 10,000.
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 10 November 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“The fundamental rights of the detenue, guaranteed under Article 21 and Article 22 of the Constitution of India, protecting him against arbitrary detention and assuring him of being produced before a magistrate, within 24 hours of such detention have clearly …” (para 20)

Institutional response

1
10 Nov 2025

Order issued

Concluded
Andhra Pradesh High Court External · Binding

The Andhra Pradesh High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 10,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: W.P. No. 25601 of 2024
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.