7 Nov 2025
Order issued
ConcludedThe Andhra Pradesh High Court upheld service punishment imposed on police personnel.
Disciplinary action · Procedural only.
Source: 2025 LiveLaw (AP) 176; APHC010603432024
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2025-0049Tirupati, Andhra PradeshJudgment 7 November 2025
The Director General, CISF & Ors. v. CISF Constable and others
remove/replace final sentence; department case is recorded in the judgment (paras 2-10). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 7 November 2025 in Writ Appeal No. 48 of 2025, the Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: Battu Devanand, A. Hari Haranadha Sarma, JJ.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Constable, Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), SHAR Centre, Sriharikota.
- Register number
- AP 39 CW 0041
- Case reference
- Writ Appeal No. 48 of 2025 / 2025 LiveLaw (AP) 176; APHC010603432024
- Court and date
- Andhra Pradesh High Court (Coram: Battu Devanand, A. Hari Haranadha Sarma, JJ.), 7 November 2025
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable, Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), SHAR Centre, Sriharikota
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Rule 21 of the CCS (Conduct) Rules, 1964; Rule 18(b) of the CISF Rules, 2001
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The punishment of compulsory retirement ordered for opting conscious bigamous marriage by the writ petitioner is not disproportionate.” (at para 21)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: dismissal.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 7 November 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“The punishment of compulsory retirement ordered for opting conscious bigamous marriage by the writ petitioner is not disproportionate.” (para 21)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
19 Sep 2026
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.