CW-2025-0057Bahraich, Uttar PradeshJudgment 30 October 2025

Bahraich Man And Others vs State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home Lko. And Others

The High Court held that the conversion FIR dated 13.09.2025 was a glaring example of authorities acting to score brownie points. The High Court held that despite the woman's statement that she had gone on her own accord and return of jewellery, the authorities failed to release the petitioner under Section 169 Cr.P.C. / Section 189 BNSS. The High Court quashed the FIR and ordered immediate release if not wanted elsewhere. The High Court imposed exemplary cost of Rs. 75,000 on the State, with Rs. 50,000 to petitioner no.1 and Rs. 25,000 to Legal Aid.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 30 October 2025 in CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9068 of 2025, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench (Coram: Abdul Moin, Babita Rani, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Police personnel, Police Station Matera, District Bahraich, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 50,000.

Register number
UP 40 CW 0001
Case reference
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9068 of 2025
Court and date
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench (Coram: Abdul Moin, Babita Rani, JJ.), 30 October 2025
Officer(s) at the material time
Police personnel, Police Station Matera, District Bahraich
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 2023 / Section 169 Cr.P.C 189 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Finding of the Court (extract)
“in order to score brownie points on the basis of the FIR” (at para para 7)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 50,000.
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 30 October 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“in order to score brownie points on the basis of the FIR” (para para 7)

Institutional response

1
30 Oct 2025

Order issued

Concluded
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench External · Binding

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench recorded adverse findings against police personnel.

adverse finding compensation.
Source: CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9068 of 2025
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
24 Sep 2026

(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.