18 Jul 2025
Order issued
ConcludedThe Supreme Court of India recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
adverse finding compensation.
Source: 2025 INSC 870
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2025-0077TelanganaJudgment 18 July 2025
Telangana Woman & Anr. vs State of Telangana & Anr.
The Supreme Court examined the arrest and eight-day custody of a 70-year-old accused in a civil sale-deed dispute under FIR No. 771 of 2020. The Supreme Court held that the complainant was misusing the process of police investigation so as to entangle the accused. The Supreme Court held that the arrest in a civil dispute clearly showed the complainant company's clout on the police agency. The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings as a gross abuse of the process of law.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 18 July 2025 in Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 10748 of 2023 (FIR No. 771 of 2020), the Supreme Court of India (Coram: Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, JJ.) adjudicated the matter concerning the Investigating officers, Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad (Telangana Police).
- Register number
- TG 00 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 10748 of 2023 (FIR No. 771 of 2020) / 2025 INSC 870
- Court and date
- Supreme Court of India (Coram: Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, JJ.), 18 July 2025
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Investigating officers, Gachibowli Police Station, Cyberabad (Telangana Police)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “clearly shows the clout of the company of which the complainant is an agent, on the police agency” (at para as summarized from judgment text)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Adverse finding. Sentence: imprisonment.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 18 July 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“clearly shows the clout of the company of which the complainant is an agent, on the police agency” (para as summarized from judgment text)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
24 Sep 2026
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.