16 Jul 2025
Order issued
ConcludedThe High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
adverse finding compensation.
Source: CRM-M No. 36362 of 2025
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2025-0078Chandigarh, ChandigarhJudgment 16 July 2025
Chandigarh Man vs State Of Ut Chandigarh And Others
The High Court held that there are no prospects of a free and fair investigation of the assault case by the Investigating Agency of UT, Chandigarh. The Court found that the Chandigarh Police SIT was proceeding in a tainted manner to give benefit to the accused serving police officials and was trying to create loopholes in the investigation. The Court noted that the SIT called the accused untraceable though all were serving police officials and had already made up its mind to delete the attempt-to-murder charge. The Court withdrew the investigation from UT, Chandigarh with immediate effect and handed it to the Central Bureau of Investigation. The Supreme Court later dismissed the accused officers' petition challenging the transfer, leaving the High Court's order intact.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 16 July 2025 in CRM-M No. 36362 of 2025, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh (Coram: [name withheld], J.) adjudicated the matter concerning the Superintendent of Police (SIT in-charge), Chandigarh Police.
- Register number
- CH 01 CW 0023
- Case reference
- CRM-M No. 36362 of 2025
- Court and date
- High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh (Coram: [name withheld], J.), 16 July 2025
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Superintendent of Police (SIT in-charge), Chandigarh Police
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- the Section 109, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “there are no prospects of free and fair investigation in the case” (at para quoted in report of judgment)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Adverse finding.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 16 July 2025. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“there are no prospects of free and fair investigation in the case” (para quoted in report of judgment)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
24 Sep 2026
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.