CW-2026-0026Prayagraj, Uttar PradeshJudgment 8 June 2026

Prayagraj Man and another vs State Of U.P. and 4 Others

Replace closing boilerplate with the recorded State version: AGA filed a counter affidavit (taken on record 27.4.2026); Commissioner's compliance affidavit averred no person was detained under BNSS 170/126/135 and stated persons refusing personal bonds are sent to judicial custody (para 11). Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 8 June 2026 in Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 317 of 2026, the Allahabad High Court (Coram: Siddharth, Vinai Kumar Dwivedi, JJ.) returned findings adverse to 5 police personnel, namely: Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bara, Commissionerate Prayagraj; SHO, PS Khiri, Prayagraj; Sub-Inspector, PS Khiri, Prayagraj; Constable, PS Khiri, Prayagraj; Police personnel, PS Khiri, Prayagraj, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).

Register number
UP 70 CW 0004
Case reference
Habeas Corpus Writ Petition No. 317 of 2026 / 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 321
Court and date
Allahabad High Court (Coram: Siddharth, Vinai Kumar Dwivedi, JJ.), 8 June 2026
Officer(s) at the material time
Assistant Commissioner of Police, Bara, Commissionerate Prayagraj; SHO, PS Khiri, Prayagraj; Sub-Inspector, PS Khiri, Prayagraj; Constable, PS Khiri, Prayagraj; Police personnel, PS Khiri, Prayagraj
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 170 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Section 126 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Section 135 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Therefore, it is clear that the provisions of Sections 170, 126, and 135 of the B.N.S.S. were flagrantly violated by the Assistant Commissioner of Police/Special In-charge Magistrate, Commissionerate Prayagraj. If petitioner no. 1 did not furnished the personal bond on …” (at para 10)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 8 June 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Therefore, it is clear that the provisions of Sections 170, 126, and 135 of the B.N.S.S. were flagrantly violated by the Assistant Commissioner of Police/Special In-charge Magistrate, Commissionerate Prayagraj. If petitioner no. 1 did not furnished the personal bond on …” (para 10)

Institutional response

1
8 Jun 2026

Order issued

Concluded
Allahabad High Court External · Binding

The Allahabad High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 200,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2026 LiveLaw (AB) 321
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.