6 Aug 2026
Order issued
ConcludedThe High Court of Judicature at Allahabad recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
adverse finding compensation.
Source: 2026:AHC:165122
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2026-0066Agra, Uttar PradeshJudgment 6 August 2026
Agra Woman And 2 Others vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others
The High Court held that confinement of the two adult women in the parental home against their wishes was unlawful and without legal sanction. The High Court held that the State machinery failed to discharge its constitutional obligations to protect their liberty. The High Court declared both women free to live where they choose and directed police protection and return of documents. The High Court awarded Rs. 25,00,000 compensation to be shared equally, payable by the father and the State, with liberty to recover from erring staff.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 6 August 2026 in HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1079 of 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Coram: Sandeep Jain, J.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Inspector, Police Station Cyber Crime, Agra; Sub-Inspector, Police Station Cyber Crime, Agra, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 25 lakh (Rs 25,00,000).
- Register number
- UP 80 CW 0007
- Case reference
- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 1079 of 2026 / 2026:AHC:165122
- Court and date
- High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Coram: Sandeep Jain, J.), 6 August 2026
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Inspector, Police Station Cyber Crime, Agra; Sub-Inspector, Police Station Cyber Crime, Agra
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 87 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023; the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The State machinery failed to discharge its constitutional obligations” (at para para 61)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 25 lakh (Rs 25,00,000).
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 6 August 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“The State machinery failed to discharge its constitutional obligations” (para para 61)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
24 Sep 2026
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.