CW-2026-0069Dakshina Kannada (Mangaluru), KarnatakaJudgment 2 September 2026

Sri Dakshina Kannada Man vs State Of Karnataka

The High Court allowed the writ petition in part, quashed FIR in Crime No.102/2026 by Kankanadi Town Police Station qua the petitioners on the ground that Andar Bahar is a game of skill, quashed the JMFC (VI Court) Mangaluru remand order in N.C.No.02 of 2026 dated 25.07.2026, and directed return of illegally seized money/items/valuables under Property List No.116 of 2026 to petitioner2 following the unauthorized raid on 25.07.2026. No departmental/disciplinary action was ordered in the operative directions.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 2 September 2026 in WP No. 27908 of 2026 (GM-RES), the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (Coram: M. Nagaprasanna, J.) adjudicated the matter concerning 4 police personnel, namely: Station House Officer, Kankanadi Town Police Station, Mangaluru City; Police Sub-Inspector, Kankanadi Town Police Station, Mangaluru City; Police Sub-Inspector, Kankanadi Town Police Station, Mangaluru City; Police Constable, Kankanadi Town Police Station, Mangaluru City.

Register number
KA 19 CW 0005
Case reference
WP No. 27908 of 2026 (GM-RES) / NC: 2026:KHC:47995
Court and date
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru (Coram: M. Nagaprasanna, J.), 2 September 2026
Officer(s) at the material time
Station House Officer, Kankanadi Town Police Station, Mangaluru City; Police Sub-Inspector, Kankanadi Town Police Station, Mangaluru City; Police Sub-Inspector, Kankanadi Town Police Station, Mangaluru City; Police Constable, Kankanadi Town Police Station, Mangaluru City
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
the Sections 79 and 80 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Mandamus issues to respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 are directed to forthwith return the illegally seized money,” (at para Operative direction)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding.
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 2 September 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Mandamus issues to respondent Nos.4, 5 and 6 are directed to forthwith return the illegally seized money,” (para Operative direction)

Institutional response

1
2 Sep 2026

Order issued

Concluded
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru External · Binding

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru recorded adverse findings against police personnel.

adverse finding compensation.
Source: NC: 2026:KHC:47995
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
24 Sep 2026

(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.