12 Jun 2026
Order issued
ConcludedThe Gauhati High Court (Aizawl Bench) recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
disciplinary upheld.
Source: 2026:GAU-MZ:303
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2026-0091Aizawl, MizoramJudgment 12 June 2026
Mizoram Police Upper Division Clerk / Sub-Inspector of Police (Ministerial) vs State Of Mizoram And 3 Ors
The petitioner was ministerial staff of the Mizoram Police who faced charges of diversion of public funds and underwent successive dismissal and reinstatement rounds. The High Court held that the earlier dismissal orders had been set aside only on procedural grounds and the petitioner had already been restored with liberty for fresh proceedings. The High Court held that the 2016 compulsory-retirement penalty with compassionate pension stood and the intervening suspension periods were rightly treated as non-countable. The High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking counting of about 11 years and 14 days of suspension with back benefits.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 12 June 2026 in WP(C)/169/2019, the Gauhati High Court (Aizawl Bench) (Coram: Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, J.) upheld the disciplinary action taken against the Upper Division Clerk / Sub-Inspector of Police (Ministerial), Mizoram Police.
- Register number
- MZ 01 CW 0002
- Case reference
- WP(C)/169/2019 / 2026:GAU-MZ:303
- Court and date
- Gauhati High Court (Aizawl Bench) (Coram: Sanjeev Kumar Sharma, J.), 12 June 2026
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Upper Division Clerk / Sub-Inspector of Police (Ministerial), Mizoram Police
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- the Rule 1037 Mizoram Police Manual; the Rule 10(7) CCS (CCA) Rules; FR 54(5)
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “I do not find any merit in the writ petition, which accordingly stands dismissed.” (at para as reported on IndianKanoon doc/174883276)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Disciplinary action upheld. Sentence: imprisonment.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 12 June 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“I do not find any merit in the writ petition, which accordingly stands dismissed.” (para as reported on IndianKanoon doc/174883276)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
24 Sep 2026
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.