CW-2026-0092Cachar, AssamJudgment 17 September 2026

Cachar Man vs The State Of Assam And 17 Ors

The High Court held that the arrest of the 60-year-old man picked up after midnight was illegal. The High Court held that the man had died while in illegal police custody after being taken to Kalain Patrol Post. The High Court directed the State to pay Rs.5,00,000 as palliative compensation to the petitioner for distribution among the heirs. The High Court left criminal liability arising from the related case to the trial court and allowed the State to recover from officials found at fault.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 17 September 2026 in WP(C)/4329/2015, the The Gauhati High Court (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) (Coram: Kalyan Rai Surana, Susmita Phukan Khaund, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Officer-in-Charge, Katigorah Police Station / Kalain Patrol Post, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).

Register number
AS 11 CW 0003
Case reference
WP(C)/4329/2015 / 2026:GAU-AS:13808-DB
Court and date
The Gauhati High Court (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) (Coram: Kalyan Rai Surana, Susmita Phukan Khaund, JJ.), 17 September 2026
Officer(s) at the material time
Officer-in-Charge, Katigorah Police Station / Kalain Patrol Post
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
147/148/149/353/336/323; 448/325/506/354/302/34
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Thus, the arrest of Md. [name withheld], since deceased, was illegal” (at para Para 11)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 5 lakh (Rs 5,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Judgment dated 17 September 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Recorded allegations

1
Custodial deathPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Thus, the arrest of Md. [name withheld], since deceased, was illegal” (para Para 11)

Institutional response

1
17 Sep 2026

Order issued

Concluded
The Gauhati High Court (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) External · Binding

The The Gauhati High Court (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) recorded adverse findings against police personnel.

adverse finding compensation.
Source: 2026:GAU-AS:13808-DB
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
24 Sep 2026

(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.