7 Aug 2026
Order issued
ConcludedThe High Court for the State of Telangana recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
adverse finding compensation.
Source: W.P. No. 26326 of 2026
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2026-0093TelanganaJudgment 7 August 2026
Telangana Resident vs The State of Telangana
The High Court examined a Section 94 BNSS notice sent to X seeking the petitioner's user details in Crime No. 404 of 2026. The High Court held that the FIR contained no reference to the petitioner in any way. The High Court held that there was no basis for issuing the notice against the petitioner. The High Court set aside the notice so far as it treated the petitioner as involved and restrained coercive steps without due process.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 7 August 2026 in W.P. No. 26326 of 2026, the High Court for the State of Telangana (Coram: Tangirala Madhavi Devi, J.) adjudicated the matter concerning the Investigating officer, Falaknuma Police Station.
- Register number
- TG 00 CW 0003
- Case reference
- W.P. No. 26326 of 2026
- Court and date
- High Court for the State of Telangana (Coram: Tangirala Madhavi Devi, J.), 7 August 2026
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Investigating officer, Falaknuma Police Station
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 94 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “there is no basis for the issuance of the notice under Section 94 of BNSS to X (Twitter).” (at para para 4)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Adverse finding.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 7 August 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“there is no basis for the issuance of the notice under Section 94 of BNSS to X (Twitter).” (para para 4)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
24 Sep 2026
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.