27 Jul 2026
Order issued
ConcludedThe High Court for the State of Telangana recorded adverse findings against police personnel.
adverse finding compensation.
Source: Contempt Case Nos. 3482 and 3483 of 2026
Not yet re-checked.
CW-2026-0094Medchal-Malkajgiri, TelanganaJudgment 27 July 2026
M/s [name withheld] vs [name withheld]
The High Court dealt with contempt petitions alleging HYDRAA staff entered the petitioner's Lothukunta land with police presence and machinery despite restraining orders and an undertaking. The High Court held that detaining the petitioner's representative and registering an FIR were not denied and that the conduct met the test for defiance. The High Court rejected the apology as shorn of penitence. The High Court held the officer guilty of civil contempt and directed that he be relieved as Commissioner of HYDRAA.
Externally reportedV2
What this record means
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Detailed record
Report card
By judgment dated 27 July 2026 in Contempt Case Nos. 3482 and 3483 of 2026, the High Court for the State of Telangana (Coram: Anil Kumar Jukanti, J.) adjudicated the matter concerning the Commissioner (IPS officer), Hyderabad Disaster Response and Assets Protection Agency (HYDRAA).
- Register number
- TG 08 CW 0003
- Case reference
- Contempt Case Nos. 3482 and 3483 of 2026
- Court and date
- High Court for the State of Telangana (Coram: Anil Kumar Jukanti, J.), 27 July 2026
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Commissioner (IPS officer), Hyderabad Disaster Response and Assets Protection Agency (HYDRAA)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Not stated in the cited sources
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “willful, deliberate, intentional disobedience to the restraining orders of this Court and breach of an undertaking given” (at para para 57)
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Adverse finding. Sentence: imprisonment.
- Present status of the proceedings
- The judgment is recent and may be subject to appeal; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Current position
Judgment dated 27 July 2026. This judgment may still be subject to appeal; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Evidence position
Recorded allegations
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Attributed to the court
What the court found
Holding not recorded separately.
“willful, deliberate, intentional disobedience to the restraining orders of this Court and breach of an undertaking given” (para para 57)
Separate from verification
Institutional response
Continuing record
Follow-up history
24 Sep 2026
(Swarm scout and independent verification pass (Muse Spark).)
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.