CBI vs UP Police Police officer (rank not stated in report)
The CBI trial court convicted former UP Police officers [name withheld] and [name withheld] on 4 March 2020 for conspiring with Kuldeep Sengar's camp to foist a false Arms Act FIR on the Unnao rape survivor's father, after which he was beaten and died in custody at Makhi police station in April 2018. Both policemen were sentenced to 10 years in jail. Their appeals are pending before the Delhi High Court, which granted them bail in September 2023.
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 22 September 2023, the District & Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (District Judge Dharmesh Sharma; transferred from UP by Supreme Court order 01-08-2019) convicted 2 police personnel, namely: Police officer (rank not stated in report), UP Police, Makhi police station, Unnao; Police officer (rank not stated in report), UP Police, Makhi police station, Unnao.
- Register number
- UP 35 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Crl.A.382/2020; reported in the judgment of the Delhi High Court
- Court and date
- The District & Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (District Judge Dharmesh Sharma; transferred from UP by Supreme Court order 01-08-2019), 22 September 2023
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Police officer (rank not stated in report), UP Police, Makhi police station, Unnao; Police officer (rank not stated in report), UP Police, Makhi police station, Unnao
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 166 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 167 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 203 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 211 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 218 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 341 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “seeking suspension of conviction of the appellants vide judgment dated 04.03.2020 and suspension of sentence vide order dated 13.03.2020 passed by the Ld. District & Sessions Judge (West), Tis-Hazari Courts, Delhi, during the pendency of the present appeals.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 10 years imprisonment each (along with Sengar and 3 others)
- Present status of the proceedings
- An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
District & Sessions Judge (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (District Judge Dharmesh Sharma; transferred from UP by Supreme Court order 01-08-2019) convicted the accused police personnel on 22 September 2023. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: 10 years imprisonment each (along with Sengar and 3 others)
Sections: IPC 120B; IPC 304 Part II; IPC 166; IPC 167; IPC 193; IPC 201; IPC 203; IPC 211; IPC 218; IPC 323; IPC 341
Appeal status
Appeal pending. Appeal text