Trial-court conviction
t2w2-05-001Bengaluru Urban, KarnatakaConvicted 29 September 2016

State by Inspector of Police, Karnataka Lokayuktha (City Wing), Cr.No.59/2009 vs G. Chandrashekaraiah — Spl.C.C.No.37/2010

The LXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act, Bengaluru (CCH-78, Manjunath Nayak) on 29 September 2016 convicted Head Constable G. Chandrashekaraiah of Vijayanagara police station for demanding Rs 4,000 (scaled down to Rs 1,000) from complainant [name withheld] to execute a non-bailable warrant against [name withheld] (C.C.No.12321/2007, 19th ACMM Court), accepting Rs 100 on the morning of 20 August 2009 and trapped the same afternoon receiving the Rs 900 balance near the City Civil Court canteen, with phenolphthalein hand/pocket washes turning pink. He was sentenced to 6 months SI (Sec.7) and 1 year SI (Sec.13) with fines, concurrent. His appeal Crl.A.1722/2016 stood pending in the Lokayukta pending-appeals list as on 31-12-2025.

Trial-court convictionV2
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 29 September 2016, the LXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Court and Special Court under Prevention of Corruption Act, Bengaluru (CCH-78) convicted the G. Chandrashekaraiah (Head Constable).

Register number
KA 01 CW 0019
Case reference
Spl.C.C.No.37/2010; reported in the judgment of the Karnataka High Court
Court and date
The LXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Court and Special Court under Prevention of Corruption Act, Bengaluru (CCH-78), 29 September 2016
Officer(s) at the material time
G. Chandrashekaraiah (Head Constable)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Finding of the Court (extract)
“In view of my findings on the above points, accused is liable to be convicted. Result of the case: Accused is convicted.”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 6 months SI + Rs 2,000 fine (in default 1 month SI) under Sec.7; 1 year SI + Rs 4,000 fine (in default 2 months SI) under Sec.13(1)(d) r/w 13(2); substantive sentences concurrent; set-off under Sec.428 CrPC
Present status of the proceedings
An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

LXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Court and Special Court under Prevention of Corruption Act, Bengaluru (CCH-78) convicted the accused police personnel on 29 September 2016. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: 6 months SI + Rs 2,000 fine (in default 1 month SI) under Sec.7; 1 year SI + Rs 4,000 fine (in default 2 months SI) under Sec.13(1)(d) r/w 13(2); substantive sentences concurrent; set-off under Sec.428 CrPC

Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2)

Appeal status

Appeal pending.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.