Trial-court conviction
t2w2-07-005Kannur, KeralaConvicted 19 November 2013

State (VACB) vs K. Ibrahim — CC No.19/2005 (Rs 3,000 bribe extorted from autorickshaw driver)

The Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode convicted Karikkottakkari Sub-Inspector K. Ibrahim in CC 19/2005 on 19-11-2013 for demanding Rs 5,000 (reduced to Rs 3,000) from an autorickshaw driver stopped at midnight on 02-05-2003, seizing his vehicle documents, repeating the demand with threats of a false case, and accepting Rs 3,000 at his quarters on 12-05-2003 in a VACB trap; the co-accused police constable (A2) was acquitted at trial for want of evidence. The court imposed two years RI with Rs 10,000 fine on each PC Act count. The Kerala High Court (Justice A. Badharudeen, Crl.A.1670/2013, 21-01-2026, 2026:KER:5210) confirmed the conviction and reduced the sentence to the statutory minimum, cancelling his bail and directing surrender.

Trial-court convictionV2
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 19 November 2013, the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode convicted the K. Ibrahim (Sub-Inspector of Police).

Register number
KL 13 CW 0005
Case reference
Crl.A.No.1670 of 2013; trial C.C.No.19/2005 (Enquiry Commissioner & Special Judge, Kozhikode); reported in the judgment of the Kerala High Court
Court and date
The Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode, 19 November 2013
Officer(s) at the material time
K. Ibrahim (Sub-Inspector of Police)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The conviction entered by the Special Court, after properly appreciating the evidence, does not call for any interference... The conviction ... under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of the PC Act, 1988, is confirmed.”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Trial: 2 years RI + Rs 10,000 fine on each count (default 1 month RI), concurrent. On appeal: reduced to 6 months RI + Rs 10,000 (s.7) and 1 year RI + Rs 10,000 (s.13)
Present status of the proceedings
The conviction was affirmed in appeal.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Kozhikode convicted the accused police personnel on 19 November 2013. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: Trial: 2 years RI + Rs 10,000 fine on each count (default 1 month RI), concurrent. On appeal: reduced to 6 months RI + Rs 10,000 (s.7) and 1 year RI + Rs 10,000 (s.13).

Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2)

Appeal status

Upheld on appeal. Appeal text

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.