Trial-court conviction
t2w2-10-009Central Delhi, DelhiConvicted 21 August 2003

CBI v. Delhi Police Sub-Inspector

The Special Judge, Tis Hazari convicted SI of PS Jama Masjid in CC No.57/1996 for demanding Rs 5,000 illegal gratification on 25.09.1995 from PW1 for not taking adverse action against him in fake-university-degrees Crime No.187/95 which he was investigating, with the CBI recovering tainted Rs 4,000 at Tis Hazari Courts from a head constable who took it at the SI's instance (complaint 06.10.1995), holding him guilty on 21.08.2003 under sections 7 and 13 of the PC Act, 1947. He was sentenced to four years RI with Rs 500 fine under each provision. On 02.02.2026 Justice Chandrasekharan Sudha dismissed his appeal (CRL.A. 733/2002). (Row merged in Pass 1-resume with ex-029, an internal duplicate.)

Trial-court convictionV1
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 21 August 2003, the Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (2003; Rouse Avenue Courts did not exist then) convicted the Sub-Inspector, PS Jama Masjid, Delhi Police.

Register number
DL 06 CW 0008
Case reference
CC No.57/1996; RC No.86(A)/95-DLI; CRL.A. 733/2002
Court and date
The Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (2003; Rouse Avenue Courts did not exist then), 21 August 2003
Officer(s) at the material time
Sub-Inspector, PS Jama Masjid, Delhi Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947
Finding of the Court (extract)
“I do not find any reason to disbelieve the prosecution case. Hence, I find no infirmity in the impugned judgement calling for an interference by this court. In the result, the appeal is dismissed.”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 4 years RI + Rs 500 fine under each provision (3 months RI in default)
Present status of the proceedings
The conviction was affirmed in appeal.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (2003; Rouse Avenue Courts did not exist then) convicted the accused police personnel on 21 August 2003. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: 4 years RI + Rs 500 fine under each provision (3 months RI in default)

Sections: PC Act 1947 s.7; PC Act 1947 s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2)

Appeal status

Upheld on appeal. Appeal text

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.