CBI v. Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector (No.2979/D)
The Special Judge, Tis Hazari convicted ASI of PP Shanti Nagar for demanding Rs 10,000 (scaled to Rs 5,000) from [name withheld] on 15.06.1996, threatening arrest in a complaint he was handling, catching him red-handed in a CBI trap, and also for obstructing/assaulting and destroying evidence during the trap. He was sentenced on 26.04.2001 to up to three years SI with fines. On 15.09.2021 Justice Anu Malhotra dismissed his appeal (CRL.A. 289/2001), upheld the conviction and withdrew the bail granted in 2001.
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 25 April 2001, the Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi convicted the Assistant Sub-Inspector (No.2979/D), Police Post Shanti Nagar, PS Keshav Puram, Delhi Police.
- Register number
- DL 08 CW 0003
- Case reference
- RC No. 47(A)/96-DLI; appeal Crl.A. 289/2001
- Court and date
- The Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, 25 April 2001
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Assistant Sub-Inspector (No.2979/D), Police Post Shanti Nagar, PS Keshav Puram, Delhi Police
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 201 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 332 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 224 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 186 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The appeal is thus, dismissed and the bail granted to the appellant is cancelled.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: s.7: 2yr SI+Rs 2,000; s.13: 3yr SI+Rs 5,000; s.201 r/w 511: 3mo SI+Rs 500; s.332: 1yr SI+Rs 1,500; s.224: 6mo SI+Rs 1,000; concurrent (sentence order 26.04.2001)
- Present status of the proceedings
- The conviction was affirmed in appeal.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi convicted the accused police personnel on 25 April 2001. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: s.7: 2yr SI+Rs 2,000; s.13: 3yr SI+Rs 5,000; s.201 r/w 511: 3mo SI+Rs 500; s.332: 1yr SI+Rs 1,500; s.224: 6mo SI+Rs 1,000; concurrent (sentence order 26.04.2001)
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d); IPC 201 r/w 511; IPC 332; IPC 224; IPC 186; IPC 353
Appeal status
Upheld on appeal. Appeal text