State v. Delhi Police Constable (No.1233/W) and others
The trial court convicted Constable of PS Tilak Nagar on 16.02.2009 for demanding Rs 5,000 (settled at Rs 2,000) from bus owner [name withheld] to hush up a section 506 case over a quarrel with a traffic ZO, catching him red-handed accepting the money inside the police station in an ACB trap on 24.07.2004; co-accused ASI was acquitted. The facts are recorded in the CAT's 07.02.2012 order in his dismissal challenge. His criminal appeal was pending then; present status unknown.
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 16 February 2009, the Trial Court, Delhi (exact court not stated in CAT order) convicted the Constable (No.1233/W), PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi Police.
- Register number
- DL 04 CW 0011
- Case reference
- FIR No. 35/04 dated 24.07.2004, PS ACB; reported in the judgment of the Court of Special Judge, Delhi
- Court and date
- The Trial Court, Delhi (exact court not stated in CAT order), 16 February 2009
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Constable (No.1233/W), PS Tilak Nagar, Delhi Police
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The criminal case culminated in the acquittal of ASI [name withheld] and conviction of the applicant vide judgment dated 16.2.2009 passed by learned Special Judge.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Not stated in CAT order (trial judgment 16.02.2009; sentence quantum not traced)
- Present status of the proceedings
- An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Trial Court, Delhi (exact court not stated in CAT order) convicted the accused police personnel on 16 February 2009. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: Not stated in CAT order (trial judgment 16.02.2009; sentence quantum not traced)
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13
Appeal status
Appeal pending.