CBI v. Delhi Police Sub-Inspector (Exe., No.D-3236; VII Bn DAP at CAT stage)
Special Judge (CBI) New Delhi held Delhi Police Sub-Inspector (No.D-3236) guilty on 23.03.2010 under sections 7 and 13 of the PC Act and sentenced him on 26.03.2010 to two years RI with Rs 5,000 fine on each count, concurrent, as recorded in the CAT's 04.01.2011 order (OA 4362/2010); the FIR number, bribe facts and offence-time posting are not stated in the order, though he had been dismissed on 29.05.2006 (reinstated after CAT/HC orders) and faced a departmental enquiry from DCP South from 12.01.2009. He filed a criminal appeal before the Delhi High Court, which suspended the sentence on 08.04.2010 on Rs 10,000 bond pending final decision. (Distinct from Ct. [name withheld] of PS Neb Sarai, t2w2-10-013.)
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 23 March 2010, the Court of Special Judge (CBI), New Delhi convicted the Sub-Inspector (Exe., No.D-3236; VII Bn DAP at CAT stage), Delhi Police (departmental enquiry by DCP South District).
- Register number
- DL 03 CW 0009
- Case reference
- CBI v. Delhi Police Sub-Inspector (Exe., No.D-3236; VII Bn DAP at CAT stage)
- Court and date
- The Court of Special Judge (CBI), New Delhi, 23 March 2010
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Sub-Inspector (Exe., No.D-3236; VII Bn DAP at CAT stage), Delhi Police (departmental enquiry by DCP South District)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “Vide order dated 23.3.2010 of Special Judge, CBI, New Delhi, he has been held guilty under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the said Act.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 2yr RI+Rs 5,000 (s.7, 6 months RI default); 2yr RI+Rs 5,000 (s.13, 6 months RI default); concurrent (sentence order 26.03.2010; suspended 08.04.2010)
- Present status of the proceedings
- An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Court of Special Judge (CBI), New Delhi convicted the accused police personnel on 23 March 2010. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: 2yr RI+Rs 5,000 (s.7, 6 months RI default); 2yr RI+Rs 5,000 (s.13, 6 months RI default); concurrent (sentence order 26.03.2010; suspended 08.04.2010)
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2)
Appeal status
Appeal pending.