State v. Delhi Police Head Constable and others
The Special Judge, Tis Hazari convicted Delhi Traffic Police Head Constable and Constable in ACB FIR 16/03 for demanding and accepting bribe from driver [name withheld] - who complained they harassed him while plying truck HR-38-G 6924 on the Delhi-Bahadurgarh route via Ring Road and Rohtak Road - catching both red-handed in a trap on 02.04.2003 for not challaning the vehicle, with Rs 3,000 recovered from [name withheld], holding them guilty on 25.11.2010 under sections 7 and 13 of the PC Act, as recorded in the CAT's 24.05.2012 order (OA 1084/2010). [name withheld] filed an appeal before the Delhi High Court which is sub judice with sentence suspended; both had been suspended since the trap and faced a revived departmental enquiry from 27.01.2010. (Distinct from undertrial [name withheld] in t2w2-10-037.)
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 25 November 2010, the Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi convicted 2 police personnel, namely: Head Constable, Traffic Unit, Delhi Police; Constable, Traffic Unit, Delhi Police.
- Register number
- DL 00 CW 0025
- Case reference
- FIR No.16/03, PS ACB
- Court and date
- The Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, 25 November 2010
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Head Constable, Traffic Unit, Delhi Police; Constable, Traffic Unit, Delhi Police
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “applicants have been convicted vide an order dated 25.11.2010 by the Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Quantum not stated in CAT order (convicted 25.11.2010; [name withheld]'s sentence suspended pending appeal)
- Present status of the proceedings
- An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Court of Special Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi convicted the accused police personnel on 25 November 2010. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: Quantum not stated in CAT order (convicted 25.11.2010; [name withheld]'s sentence suspended pending appeal)
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13
Appeal status
Appeal pending.