CBI v. Delhi Police Sub-Inspector (Investigating Officer) and others
Special Judge (PC Act) CBI-13 Pulastya Pramachala, Rouse Avenue convicted SI of PS Khajuri Khas for demanding Rs 4 lakh from complainant [name withheld] to save his son [name withheld] - in custody in FIR 100/18 and newly booked in FIR 205/18 (ss.376/420/34 IPC and POCSO) which [name withheld] was investigating - and accepting Rs 1 lakh, with the demand verified at Karkardooma Courts on 26.04.2018 and a CBI trap under Insp. Raman Kumar Shukla laid the same night, holding him guilty on 21.05.2019 under sections 7 and 13 of the PC Act for abusing his position as investigating officer. The conviction judgment does not include the sentence order. (Kanoon mislabels the title as U.P. vs Anil Singh; the matter is CBI vs [name withheld].)
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 21 May 2019, the Court of Sh. Pulastya Pramachala, Special Judge (PC Act) CBI-13, Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi convicted the Sub-Inspector (Investigating Officer), PS Khajuri Khas, North East District, Delhi Police.
- Register number
- DL 05 CW 0020
- Case reference
- CBI/253/2019 (RC-15(A)/2018/CBI/ACB)
- Court and date
- The Court of Sh. Pulastya Pramachala, Special Judge (PC Act) CBI-13, Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi, 21 May 2019
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Sub-Inspector (Investigating Officer), PS Khajuri Khas, North East District, Delhi Police
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “Accused was caught red handed, while demanding and accepting bribe of Rs.1 lac from complainant, in order to show favour towards son of complainant.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Separate sentence order (not in 114-page conviction judgment dated 21.05.2019)
- Present status of the proceedings
- No appeal is known from the cited sources.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Court of Sh. Pulastya Pramachala, Special Judge (PC Act) CBI-13, Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi convicted the accused police personnel on 21 May 2019. No appeal is known from the cited sources.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: Separate sentence order (not in 114-page conviction judgment dated 21.05.2019)
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(2) r/w s.13(1)(d)
Appeal status
No appeal known.