Trial-court conviction
t2w3-21-005Haridwar, UttarakhandConvicted 2 August 2018

State of Uttarakhand v. Uttarakhand Police Constable

Per the Uttarakhand High Court revision judgment, Constable was convicted under IPC s.223 by the trial court (Criminal Case No. 8747 of 2018, judgment 02-08-2018) for negligently allowing accused [name withheld] to escape from police custody at the railway station on 25-07-2003 while being escorted back after production before the Special Judge (Gangster Act), and was fined Rs 2,000 (acquitted of s.224). His appeal was dismissed by the Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar on 03-12-2022; on revision the High Court on 23-08-2023 released him on six months' probation of good conduct with s.12 of the Probation of Offenders Act to apply. Exact magistrate-court designation of the trial court is not stated in the appellate record.

Trial-court convictionV2
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 2 August 2018, the Trial Court (Magistrate), Haridwar jurisdiction — Criminal Case No. 8747 of 2018 (exact magistrate designation not stated in appellate record; appeal lay before the Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar) convicted the Constable, Uttarakhand Police (escort party; Probation Officer report from Tehri Garhwal).

Register number
UK 08 CW 0003
Case reference
Criminal Case No. 8747 of 2018; reported in the judgment of the Trial Magistrate Court, Haridwar
Court and date
The Trial Court (Magistrate), Haridwar jurisdiction — Criminal Case No. 8747 of 2018 (exact magistrate designation not stated in appellate record; appeal lay before the Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar), 2 August 2018
Officer(s) at the material time
Constable, Uttarakhand Police (escort party; Probation Officer report from Tehri Garhwal)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“While convicting the revisionist – accused Constable [name withheld] under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860... he was punished with a fine of Rs.2,000/-. Resultantly, the revisionist – accused [name withheld] be released on probation on good conduct …”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Fine of Rs 2,000 by the trial court; appellate court dismissed the appeal; High Court on revision released him on probation of good conduct for six months
Present status of the proceedings
The conviction was affirmed in appeal.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Trial Court (Magistrate), Haridwar jurisdiction — Criminal Case No. 8747 of 2018 (exact magistrate designation not stated in appellate record; appeal lay before the Ist Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar) convicted the accused police personnel on 2 August 2018. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: Fine of Rs 2,000 by the trial court; appellate court dismissed the appeal; High Court on revision released him on probation of good conduct for six months

Sections: IPC 223

Appeal status

Upheld on appeal. Appeal text

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.