Trial-court conviction
t2w3-29-004Dhule, MaharashtraConvicted 31 March 2008

State v. Maharashtra Police Armed Police Constable (retired)

Per the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) judgment of 08-04-2011 in Criminal Contempt Petition No.1 of 2011, [name withheld], then an Armed Police Constable, was convicted on 31-03-2008 by Shri R.V. Jatale, Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No.86/1995 for possession of assets disproportionate to known sources of income and sentenced to 2 years RI with a Rs.20,000 fine. Jadhav appealed (Criminal Appeal No.130/2008, admitted 25-04-2008 with substantive sentence suspended and bail granted); the contempt judgment records the appeal as pending then and its later fate is not traced.

Trial-court convictionV2
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 31 March 2008, the Court of Shri R.V. Jatale, Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dhule convicted the Armed Police Constable (retired), Maharashtra Police (exact unit not stated in judgment).

Register number
MH 18 CW 0001
Case reference
Criminal Contempt Petition No. 1 of 2011; reported in the judgment of the Bombay High Court
Court and date
The Court of Shri R.V. Jatale, Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dhule, 31 March 2008
Officer(s) at the material time
Armed Police Constable (retired), Maharashtra Police (exact unit not stated in judgment)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 13(1)(e) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Shri. K.P. Jadhav was convicted for offence punishable under section 13 (1) (e) read with 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for two years and fine of Rs. 20,000/-, in default to …”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 2 years RI + Rs.20,000 fine (3 months SI in default)
Present status of the proceedings
An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Court of Shri R.V. Jatale, Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dhule convicted the accused police personnel on 31 March 2008. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: 2 years RI + Rs.20,000 fine (3 months SI in default)

Sections: PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(e) r/w s.13(2)

Appeal status

Appeal pending. Appeal text

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.