Trial-court conviction
t2w3-32-006Krishna, Andhra PradeshConvicted 17 August 2007

Sessions Case No.137 of 2000 (State vs Jyothi & Ors.; custodial death of woman detainee Krishna Woman, Mahila Police Station Vijayawada); AP High Court Crl.A.No.1326 of 2007 (A-4), decided 20-04-2011

Per the AP High Court judgment of 20-04-2011, the night-duty Woman Police Constable (A-4) of Mahila Police Station, Vijayawada — whose full name is not stated in the accessed judgment text — was convicted with three colleagues by the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada on 17-08-2007 in Sessions Case No.137 of 2000 for the May-1999 custodial death of woman detainee a Krishna woman Her appeal (Crl.A.No.1326/2007) was partly allowed: convictions under IPC 302/348/331 were set aside but the IPC 201 (causing disappearance of evidence) conviction was confirmed, with release if that sentence was already served.

Trial-court convictionV1
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 17 August 2007, the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada (Krishna district) convicted the Woman Police Constable (night duty), Mahila Police Station, Vijayawada (Krishna district).

Register number
AP 39 CW 0022
Case reference
Sessions Case No.137 of 2000 (State vs Jyothi & Ors.; custodial death of woman detainee Krishna Woman, Mahila Police Station Vijayawada); AP High Court Crl.A.No.1326 of 2007 (A-4), decided 20-04-2011
Court and date
The Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada (Krishna district), 17 August 2007
Officer(s) at the material time
Woman Police Constable (night duty), Mahila Police Station, Vijayawada (Krishna district)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (trial; set aside on appeal); Section 348 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (trial; set aside on appeal); Section 331 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (trial; set aside on appeal); Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (trial; CONFIRMED on appeal)
Facts in brief
Per the AP High Court judgment of 20-04-2011, the night-duty Woman Police Constable (A-4) of Mahila Police Station, Vijayawada — whose full name is not stated in the accessed judgment text — was convicted with three colleagues by the Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada on 17-08-2007 in Sessions Case No.137 of 2000 for the May-1999 custodial death of woman detainee a Krishna woman Her appeal (Crl.A.No.1326/2007) was partly allowed: convictions under IPC 302/348/331 were set aside but the IPC 201 (causing disappearance of evidence) conviction was confirmed, with release if that sentence was already served.
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Trial: life (s.302) + 2 yrs RI each (ss.348/331/201); appeal (Crl.A.No.1326/2007, partly allowed) set aside ss.302/348/331 convictions and confirmed only s.201 IPC conviction (2 yrs RI + fine), release if already served
Present status of the proceedings
The conviction was affirmed in appeal.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Vijayawada (Krishna district) convicted the accused police personnel on 17 August 2007. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: Trial: life (s.302) + 2 yrs RI each (ss.348/331/201); appeal (Crl.A.No.1326/2007, partly allowed) set aside ss.302/348/331 convictions and confirmed only s.201 IPC conviction (2 yrs RI + fine), release if already served

Sections: Section 302, IPC (trial; set aside on appeal); Section 348, IPC (trial; set aside on appeal); Section 331, IPC (trial; set aside on appeal); Section 201, IPC (trial; CONFIRMED on appeal)

Appeal status

Upheld on appeal. Appeal text

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.