Trial-court conviction
t2w3-34-001Udaipur, RajasthanConvicted 28 July 2025

State v. Rajasthan Police Head Constable No.1078

Then Head Constable No.1078 [name withheld] of PS Goverdhan Vilas, Udaipur (bribe allegation ~Rs.800) was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act Cases) No.2, Udaipur on 28.07.2025 in Special Sessions Case No.180/2019 (CIS 344/2014, FIR 274/2011 ACB Chowki Dungarpur) under PC Act ss.7 and 13(1)(d)/13(2) and sentenced to one year's imprisonment. Sentence suspended by the Rajasthan High Court on 11.08.2025 pending S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1976/2025.

Trial-court convictionV2
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 28 July 2025, the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act Cases) No.2, Udaipur convicted the Head Constable No.1078, Police Station Goverdhan Vilas, District Udaipur, Rajasthan Police.

Register number
RJ 27 CW 0004
Case reference
Special Sessions Case No.180/2019 (CIS No.344/2014; FIR No.274/2011, ACB Chowki Dungarpur)
Court and date
The Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act Cases) No.2, Udaipur, 28 July 2025
Officer(s) at the material time
Head Constable No.1078, Police Station Goverdhan Vilas, District Udaipur, Rajasthan Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The appellant-applicant has been convicted for the offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d)/13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 1 year imprisonment
Present status of the proceedings
An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act Cases) No.2, Udaipur convicted the accused police personnel on 28 July 2025. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: 1 year imprisonment

Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d); PC Act 1988 s.13(2)

Appeal status

Appeal pending. Appeal text

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.