State (SVB Rohtak) v. Haryana Police Assistant Sub-Inspector
Per the Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment, ASI of Haryana Police (PS Sadar Rohtak) was convicted on 03-02-2004 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak under ss.7/13 of the PC Act for demanding Rs 10,000 (settled at Rs 5,000) from complainant [name withheld] to release his detained nephew, on an SVB Rohtak trap laid on his 09-08-2002 complaint, and was sentenced to 4 years RI with Rs 25,000 fine. The High Court upheld [name withheld]'s conviction on 03-03-2010 while acquitting co-accused Constable, who had merely held the tainted money without demand or direct acceptance.
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 3 February 2004, the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak convicted the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Haryana Police, PS Sadar Rohtak.
- Register number
- HR 12 CW 0001
- Case reference
- Criminal Appeal No. 430-SB of 2004; reported in the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court
- Court and date
- The Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, 3 February 2004
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Assistant Sub-Inspector, Haryana Police, PS Sadar Rohtak
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The conviction of appellant-[name withheld] under Section 7/13 of the Act is upheld. However, the sentence qua imprisonment of appellant-[name withheld] under Section 7/13 of the Act is reduced from four years rigorous imprisonment to two years rigorous imprisonment.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 4 years RI
- Present status of the proceedings
- The conviction was affirmed in appeal.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak convicted the accused police personnel on 3 February 2004. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: 4 years RI
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13
Appeal status
Upheld on appeal. Appeal text