CBI v. Delhi Police Assistant Sub-Inspector
Per the High Court and Supreme Court judgments, ASI of Delhi Police (PS Kalkaji) was convicted on 10-04-2001 by the Special Judge, Delhi under ss.7 and 13(1)(d)/13(2) of the PC Act (with s.201/511 IPC) for demanding Rs 2,000 from complainant [name withheld] — whom he had arrested in FIR No.101/1993 under s.307 IPC on 14-03-1993 — to help him in the case (threatening to ensure conviction on non-payment), caught in the CBI trap of 28-03-1993 at his office on the complaint of 27-03-1993, and was sentenced to 3 years RI with Rs 40,000 fine. The Delhi High Court dismissed his appeal on 25-01-2011; the Supreme Court on 15-01-2014 maintained the conviction but reduced the sentence to the statutory minimum (6 months s.7 + 1 year s.13(1)(d), concurrent); appeal_status upheld.
This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →Report card
By judgment dated 10 April 2001, the Special Judge, Delhi convicted the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Police Station Kalkaji (also described as Govind Puri police post; South East Delhi).
- Register number
- DL 03 CW 0003
- Case reference
- Special Judge, Delhi conviction 10-04-2001; Delhi HC Crl.A. No.252/2001; SC Crl.A. No.1406/2011
- Court and date
- The Special Judge, Delhi, 10 April 2001
- Officer(s) at the material time
- Assistant Sub-Inspector, Delhi Police, Police Station Kalkaji (also described as Govind Puri police post; South East Delhi)
- Present service status
- Not ascertained from the cited sources.
- Provisions invoked
- Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) punishable under Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 201 read with Section 511 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
- Finding of the Court (extract)
- “The appellant was eventually convicted by the said court for both the offences and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years.”
- Verdict, sentence and quantum
- Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: 3 years RI imposed 10-04-2001; on appeal reduced by Supreme Court (15-01-2014) to 6 months RI (s.7) + 1 year RI (s.13(1)(d)), concurrent
- Present status of the proceedings
- The conviction was affirmed in appeal.
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
Special Judge, Delhi convicted the accused police personnel on 10 April 2001. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.
Sentence & charges
Sentence: 3 years RI imposed 10-04-2001; on appeal reduced by Supreme Court (15-01-2014) to 6 months RI (s.7) + 1 year RI (s.13(1)(d)), concurrent
Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) punishable under s.13(2); IPC 201 r/w 511
Appeal status
Upheld on appeal. Appeal text