Trial-court conviction
t2w4-15-001Sabarkantha, GujaratConvicted 2013

State (ACB) vs Gujarat Police Police Constable

Police Constable was convicted by the 3rd Additional Special Judge, Modasa (Sabarkantha) in Special (ACB) Case No. 07 of 2013 under ss.7 and 13(1)(d)/13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for demanding a Rs 5,000 bribe from the complainant in connection with a criminal case; the conviction rested on panch-witness evidence after the complainant turned hostile. The Gujarat High Court (R.D. Kothari, J.) admitted his appeal against conviction on 13 November 2013. Sentence quantum and final appeal outcome are not stated in the order reviewed.

Trial-court convictionV2
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment in 2013, the 3rd Additional Special Judge, Modasa, Sabarkantha convicted the Police Constable, Gujarat Police (Sabarkantha; unit not stated in order).

Register number
GJ 09 CW 0002
Case reference
Special (ACB) Case No.07 of 2013; Gujarat HC R/Criminal Appeal (Against Conviction) No.1578 of 2013
Court and date
The 3rd Additional Special Judge, Modasa, Sabarkantha, 2013
Officer(s) at the material time
Police Constable, Gujarat Police (Sabarkantha; unit not stated in order)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The appellant is convicted for the offence under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Not stated in admission order
Present status of the proceedings
An appeal is pending; the pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

3rd Additional Special Judge, Modasa, Sabarkantha convicted the accused police personnel on 2013. An appeal is pending; initiation or pendency of an appeal is not a finding.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: Not stated in admission order

Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(1)(d) r/w s.13(2)

Appeal status

Appeal pending.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.