CW-2001-0003Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar, PunjabJudgment 10 May 2001

Nawanshahr Man vs State of Punjab

The judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court records the following account. A 35-year-old bank branch manager was handed over by his father [name withheld] to Inspector, SHO, on 29 December 1992 and was never released; police claimed he escaped from handcuffs during a terrorist ambush on 11 January 1993 while being taken for arms recovery. Two successive Sessions Judge enquiries rejected the ambush and escape story as not believable and found prima facie that the branch manager was eliminated in a stage-managed encounter, holding Inspector liable. The High Court directed the SHO to register a murder case, with investigation by an officer not below SP rank from outside Jalandhar range within four months. Holding the State vicariously liable for murder by its functionaries, the Court awarded Rs. 3,00,000 shared equally by widow [name withheld] and three children. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 10 May 2001, the Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: M.L. Singhal, J.) returned findings adverse to 2 police personnel, namely: Inspector, Police Station Nawanshahr; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nawanshahr, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).

Register number
PB 32 CW 0001
Case reference
2001(3) RCR(Crl.) 569
Court and date
Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: M.L. Singhal, J.), 10 May 2001
Officer(s) at the material time
Inspector, Police Station Nawanshahr; Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nawanshahr
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Article 226 of the Constitution of India
Finding of the Court (extract)
“Encounter as alleged and escape of [name withheld] was just stage managed to eliminate [name withheld].” (at para 9)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment dated 10 May 2001 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“Encounter as alleged and escape of [name withheld] was just stage managed to eliminate [name withheld].” (para 9)

Institutional response

1
10 May 2001

Order issued

Concluded
Punjab and Haryana High Court External · Binding

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 300,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: 2001(3) RCR(Crl.) 569
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.