CW-2001-0007Gurdaspur, PunjabJudgment 11 September 2001

Gurdaspur Man and Another v. State of Punjab and Others

Hedge actor/date: counsel submitted [name withheld] was abducted 17.7.1993 by ASI and others (para 5); sessions inquiry did not establish allegations (para 3); court compensated on 'allegedly kidnapped' basis after CBI challan (para 9). Add State contention that no compensation case made as nothing shows murder (para 5); drop false limits sentence. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 11 September 2001 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14150-M of 1994 (O&M), the Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: V. M. Jain, J.) returned findings adverse to the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Punjab Police, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).

Register number
PB 06 CW 0002
Case reference
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14150-M of 1994 (O&M) / (2005) 1 RCR (Criminal) 581
Court and date
Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: V. M. Jain, J.), 11 September 2001
Officer(s) at the material time
Assistant Sub-Inspector, Punjab Police
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 364 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860; Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
Finding of the Court (extract)
“However, taking into consideration that [name withheld] was allegedly kidnapped by ASI [name withheld] and other police officials, and his whereabouts were not known since July, 1993, in my opinion, the ends of justice would be fully met in case …” (at para 9)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 3 lakh (Rs 3,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment dated 11 September 2001 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“However, taking into consideration that [name withheld] was allegedly kidnapped by ASI [name withheld] and other police officials, and his whereabouts were not known since July, 1993, in my opinion, the ends of justice would be fully met in case …” (para 9)

Institutional response

1
11 Sep 2001

Order issued

Concluded
Punjab and Haryana High Court External · Binding

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 300,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: (2005) 1 RCR (Criminal) 581
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.