Order issued
ConcludedThe Punjab and Haryana High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 150,000.
The judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court records the following account. Replace final sentence ' ' with the police account from para 3: per the SSP's reply, a Jandiala Guru man was arrested 8.5.1992 at a naka with an unlicensed.30 bore mouser (FIR No.64, Arms Act), made a disclosure statement, and escaped in village Rattan Garh fields while being taken for arms recovery after asking to answer nature's call; he was declared a proclaimed offender. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.
This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.
How verification works →By judgment dated 3 February 2006 in Criminal Writ Petition 1774 of 1996, the Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: Nirmal Yadav, J.) returned findings adverse to 9 police personnel, namely: Deputy Superintendent of Police, Police Station Jandiala Guru; Inspector, Police Station Jandiala Guru; Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Station Jandiala Guru; Constable, Punjab Police; Constable, Punjab Police; Constable, Punjab Police; Constable, Punjab Police; Punjab Home Guard, Attached to Punjab Police party; Constable Driver, Punjab Police, and directed payment of compensation of Rs 1.5 lakh (Rs 1,50,000).
Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment dated 3 February 2006 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.
Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.
Official finding: supports allegation.
Holding not recorded separately.
“custodial disappearance of petitioner's husband, is purely attributable to the remissness and failure of duty on the part of the police department.” (para 9)
The Punjab and Haryana High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 150,000.
(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))
Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.
Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.
These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.