CW-2020-0006Rupnagar, PunjabJudgment 6 October 2020

Rupnagar Woman v. State of Punjab and Others

The judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court records the following account. A Rupnagar woman is a Rupnagar woman's SISTER (both daughters of Sh. Parvinder Singh), not her daughter; the absconding accused [name withheld] is a Rupnagar woman's husband and petitioner [name withheld]'s father — a Rupnagar woman is his sister-in-law, not his daughter. Rewrite as: 'a Rupnagar woman and her sister [name withheld]... wife and sister-in-law of murder accused [name withheld], who was evading arrest.'. Matters not addressed in the cited judgment text are not recorded here.

Externally reportedV2
What this record means

This page documents a court-adjudicated case from the judgment and cited sources below. Findings are attributed to the court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 6 October 2020 in CRWP No. 777 of 2019 (O&M), the Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: Rajiv Sharma, Harinder Singh Sidhu, JJ.) returned findings adverse to the Erring officials who kept detenues under detention, Police Station City Rupnagar (Ropar), and directed payment of compensation of Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).

Register number
PB 12 CW 0003
Case reference
CRWP No. 777 of 2019 (O&M)
Court and date
Punjab and Haryana High Court (Coram: Rajiv Sharma, Harinder Singh Sidhu, JJ.), 6 October 2020
Officer(s) at the material time
Erring officials who kept detenues under detention, Police Station City Rupnagar (Ropar)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Not stated in the cited sources
Finding of the Court (extract)
“exact text (para 6): 'As observed by the Ld. Single Judge even if it is accepted that some persons had tried to cause harm to the detenues, even then, both of them could not be kept in the police station …” (at para 6)
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Adverse finding + compensation. Sentence: compensation only. Compensation: Rs 2 lakh (Rs 2,00,000).
Present status of the proceedings
No further proceedings are recorded in the cited sources; the judgment is the concluded position shown.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court judgment dated 6 October 2020 is the concluded position shown in the cited sources.

Recorded allegations

1
OtherPrimary
Material fact supported

Reliable material supports a specifically documented fact relevant to that allegation, not necessarily the full allegation, causation, intent, unlawfulness, or responsibility.

Official finding: supports allegation.

What the court found

Holding not recorded separately.

“exact text (para 6): 'As observed by the Ld. Single Judge even if it is accepted that some persons had tried to cause harm to the detenues, even then, both of them could not be kept in the police station …” (para 6)

Institutional response

1
6 Oct 2020

Order issued

Concluded
Punjab and Haryana High Court External · Binding

The Punjab and Haryana High Court recorded adverse findings against police personnel and ordered Rs 200,000.

Compensation ordered · Supports allegation (for the compensated wrong only).
Source: CRWP No. 777 of 2019 (O&M)
Not yet re-checked.

Follow-up history

1
19 Sep 2026

(Round-8 full re-verification: published record re-checked against the judgment text (outcome, officers, quote, key facts) plus methodology-compliance pass; skills-guided adversarial re-verification of the published record against the judgment text (reverify/t1-*/adversarial-8.jsonl))

Corrections (0): No corrections recorded.

Review: Solo Staff combined review (one combined attestation) — not yet recorded.

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.