Trial-court conviction
t2w3-15-001Hoshiarpur, PunjabConvicted 17 January 2004

CRA No.S-285-SB of 2004 (FIR registered at PS Vigilance Bureau, Jalandhar on complaint of Hoshiarpur Man)

The Special Judge, Hoshiarpur, on 17.01.2004 convicted ASI of PS Mahilpur for demanding and accepting Rs 3,000 bribe from complainant [name withheld] for joining him and his son in investigation and accepting bail bonds in FIR No.23/2002, in a Vigilance Bureau Jalandhar trap laid at his official residence on 02.05.2002 with phenolphthalein-treated notes. He was sentenced to 1 year's RI with Rs 5,000 fine under Section 7 r/w 13(2) PC Act. The Punjab and Haryana High Court ([name withheld], 08.04.2015) found no infirmity, maintained the conviction and sentence, dismissed the appeal and ordered surrender to undergo the remaining sentence.

Trial-court convictionV2
What this record means

This page documents a trial-court conviction from the cited sources below. It is not a High Court or Supreme Court finding; the conviction may have been appealed. Findings are attributed to the convicting court; this record does not add findings of its own.

How verification works →

Report card

By judgment dated 17 January 2004, the Special Judge, Hoshiarpur convicted the Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Station Mahilpur, Hoshiarpur, Punjab Police (Investigating Officer of FIR No.23/15.02.2002).

Register number
PB 07 CW 0002
Case reference
CRA No.S-285-SB of 2004 (Punjab and Haryana HC) re: judgment dated 17.01.2004, Special Judge, Hoshiarpur; FIR at PS Vigilance Bureau, Jalandhar on complaint of a Hoshiarpur man
Court and date
The Special Judge, Hoshiarpur, 17 January 2004
Officer(s) at the material time
Assistant Sub-Inspector, Police Station Mahilpur, Hoshiarpur, Punjab Police (Investigating Officer of FIR No.23/15.02.2002)
Present service status
Not ascertained from the cited sources.
Provisions invoked
Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988; Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988
Finding of the Court (extract)
“The present appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 17.01.2004, passed by the learned Special Judge, Hoshiarpur, vide which accused-appellant [name withheld] has been held guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under Section 7 read with Section 13(2) …”
Verdict, sentence and quantum
Conviction recorded by the trial court. Sentence: Rigorous imprisonment 1 year
Present status of the proceedings
The conviction was affirmed in appeal.

Compiled from the judgment and the cited sources. Findings are those of the court; this card adds none of its own.

Special Judge, Hoshiarpur convicted the accused police personnel on 17 January 2004. The conviction was upheld on appeal. Appeal text.

Sentence & charges

Sentence: Rigorous imprisonment 1 year

Sections: PC Act 1988 s.7; PC Act 1988 s.13(2)

Appeal status

Upheld on appeal. Appeal text

Keep exploring

These records are listed together because they share a state or a topic. That does not mean they are connected.